Skip to decisions
Žuk — ANTON и JELENA

Legal archive: reviews of court practice concerning Narva apartment associations

This section contains analytical reviews and editorial summaries of publicly available court decisions concerning relations between apartment owners and apartment associations in Narva. The information has been prepared by the Žuk Kinnisvara team for informational purposes.

We explain complex legal acts in plain language. Our archive is continually updated.

We plan to add reviews of decisions of the Supreme Court of Estonia (Riigikohus) on important issues concerning relations between apartment owners and apartment associations.

Before making important legal decisions, always check the official status and full case text in the state register (Riigi Teataja / e-Toimik).

Subjects and subtopics

A subject describes the dispute; it does not establish a violation.

Additional parameters

Reset all
2-16-114467

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 17 korteriühistu · 80070061

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

The defendant did not respond after service of the documents; the court awarded debt, interest and part of the association’s costs by default.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-16-114467/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Kangelaste 17: default award of debt with interest and part of the costs

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Kangelaste 17 · 80070061

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — KÜ Kangelaste 17; Defendant XX; Association’s statutory representative XX

Editorial summary

The defendant did not respond after service of the documents; the court awarded debt, interest and part of the association’s costs by default.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted the apartment association Kangelaste 17’s claim against XX for debt and late-payment interest by default and awarded part of the court costs. The documents were served through a person living with the defendant; no written response was received within the 14 days allowed. The court accepted a 200 euro state fee and 0,32 euros in bank charges, a total of 200,32 euros. Reimbursement of 130 euros for legal assistance was refused: documents were submitted by the association’s statutory representative and there was no contractual representative in the proceedings. A further 20 euros in payment order costs was not awarded because the court did not find that such costs had been incurred. The judgment is immediately enforceable. The award of debt and costs does not confirm actual payment.

Outcome of this decision

The debt and interest claim was granted by default. Costs of 200,32 euros were awarded; the additional 130 euros for legal assistance and 20 euros in costs were refused. The judgment is immediately enforceable.
2-16-11476

Narva linn, Uusküla tn 1 korteriühistu · 80175825

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

The defendant did not respond after personal service of the claim; the court awarded the debt, late-payment interest and costs by default.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-16-11476/6Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Uusküla 1: debt and late-payment interest awarded by default; association granted refund of excess court fee

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Korteriühistu Uusküla tn 1 · 80175825

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant – Korteriühistu Uusküla tn 1; Defendant XX; Association’s contractual representative XX

Editorial summary

The defendant did not respond after personal service of the claim; the court awarded the debt, late-payment interest and costs by default.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court granted the apartment association Uusküla tn 1’s claim against XX for arrears and late-payment interest by default and also awarded litigation costs. The claim had been served personally on the defendant against signature, but no response arrived within the time limit. The brief judgment does not give a detailed debt history, charging period or objections from the defendant. The judgment is immediately enforceable. Separately, the court ordered a refund to the association of 25 euros in overpaid court fees from the state budget. This is repayment of an excess fee to the association, rather than an additional award against the defendant. The judgment does not confirm actual payment of the awarded sums or completion of the refund.

Outcome of this decision

Award the association the debt, late-payment interest and litigation costs against XX. Order a refund to the association of 25 euros in excess court fees from the state budget. The judgment is immediately enforceable.
2-15-126339

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 24 korteriühistu · 80180571

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

The association waived its claim after reporting payment by the new owner; the court terminated the case and left costs with the association.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-15-126339/23Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Kangelaste 24: case ended after payment by a new owner; costs left with the association

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KORTERIÜHISTU KANGELASTE 24 · 80180571

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant – KORTERIÜHISTU KANGELASTE 24; Two defendants XX; Association representative XX; Mentioned payer – the new owner

Editorial summary

The association waived its claim after reporting payment by the new owner; the court terminated the case and left costs with the association.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court accepted the apartment association KANGELASTE 24’s waiver of its claim against two defendants XX and terminated proceedings. The association reported that its demands had been met by the apartment’s new owner, who was not a defendant in this claim. The claim concerned arrears and late-payment interest. The ruling gives no amounts. The claim documents could not be served on the defendants, so the court did not ask for their views on the waiver. It found the waiver permissible and ended the case without a decision on the merits. It explained that the same claim against the same defendants on the same grounds could not be brought again. Costs were left with the association. The court specifically noted that the demands had been met by the new owner, rather than the defendants, so the costs exception for payment by a defendant after filing did not apply. The court identified no costs reimbursable to other participants. The association requested a court fee refund. The court left this for a separate ruling after the present ruling becomes final. No refund was ordered by this ruling itself.

Outcome of this decision

Accept the waiver and terminate proceedings. The association bears costs; no sums are reimbursable to participants. The court fee refund question is to be decided separately after the ruling becomes final.
2-16-10336

Narva linn, Kosmonaudi tn 9, Linda tn 7 korteriühistu · 80180884

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

The settlement sets instalments and default consequences but does not prove later payment.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-16-10336/6Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Debt instalments under an approved settlement

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KORTERIÜHISTU NARVA UNISTUS · 80180884

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Association — claimant and settling party; XX — defendant and settling party

Editorial summary

The settlement sets instalments and default consequences but does not prove later payment.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KORTERIÜHISTU NARVA UNISTUS (now — Narva linn, Kosmonaudi tn 9, Linda tn 7 korteriühistu). KORTERIÜHISTU NARVA UNISTUS and XX agreed to settle a debt claim. Following a partial payment, XX acknowledged the remaining debt and the agreed share of costs. The settlement provides for three instalments; a delay of even one day on any instalment makes the whole balance immediately due and triggers daily late-payment interest of 0.07% on the unpaid part. The source does not disclose the substantive basis of the original claim.

Outcome of this decision

The court approved the settlement and terminated the proceedings. Costs follow the agreement; each party bears its costs not covered by it. The court reserved the refund issue for a separate order after this order becomes final.
2-16-105937

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 34 korteriühistu · 80170621

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayObligations of multiple owners

Editorial summary

The default award includes notarial costs and joint and several liability of two co-owners.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-16-105937/8Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Kangelaste 34: joint and several award and notarial costs

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Kangelaste 34 · 80170621

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: claimant — KÜ Kangelaste 34; two defendants — co-owners XX

Editorial summary

The default award includes notarial costs and joint and several liability of two co-owners.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KÜ Kangelaste 34 (now — Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 34 korteriühistu). KÜ Kangelaste 34 sought management charges, late-payment interest and reimbursement of notarial costs incurred to formalise the rights of two co-owners XX. Both received the claim documents against signature but did not respond. The court allowed the claim by default, treating the association’s factual allegations as admitted in that procedure and the claim as legally justified. Debt, accrued late-payment interest, notarial costs and litigation costs of 545 euros were awarded jointly and severally. The association may seek performance from any debtor without recovering the same debt repeatedly. Further late-payment interest of 0.07% per day was awarded on the principal from 1 May 2016 until payment. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security; actual performance was not established.

Outcome of this decision

The claim was allowed by default; debt, late-payment interest and costs were awarded jointly and severally against two co-owners.
2-16-8048

Narva linn, Võidu prospekt 10a korteriühistu · 80183279

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

Failure to pay on time removes the agreed late-payment interest reduction.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-16-8048/4Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Võidu 10A: conditional reduction of late-payment interest by settlement

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KORTERIÜHISTU VÕIDU 10A · 80183279

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: claimant — KORTERIÜHISTU VÕIDU 10A; defendant — XX

Editorial summary

Failure to pay on time removes the agreed late-payment interest reduction.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KORTERIÜHISTU VÕIDU 10A (now — Narva linn, Võidu prospekt 10a korteriühistu). The court approved a settlement between KORTERIÜHISTU VÕIDU 10A and XX concerning management charges and late-payment interest and discontinued proceedings. The association agreed to reduce late-payment interest if the agreed amount was paid by 3 June 2016 inclusive. No further late-payment interest accrues on that debt up to that date. If the payment condition is breached, the full agreed amount without the reduction becomes payable immediately. This is a conditional late-payment interest reduction rather than unconditional forgiveness of part of the debt. Other costs remain with each party; refund of the state fee is reserved for a separate order after the order’s entry into force. The parties waived appeal. The order does not establish whether the payment condition was met.

Outcome of this decision

The settlement was approved and proceedings discontinued; the late-payment interest reduction depends on timely payment.
2-16-4494

Narva linn, Pähklimäe tn 7 korteriühistu · 80183693

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

Debt and continuing late-payment interest were awarded; recovery of 45 euros in legal fees was refused.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-16-4494/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Pähklimäe 7/11: debt, continuing late-payment interest and partial refusal of costs

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Pähklimäe 7/11 · 80183693

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — KÜ Pähklimäe 7/11; Defendant — XX

Editorial summary

Debt and continuing late-payment interest were awarded; recovery of 45 euros in legal fees was refused.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KÜ Pähklimäe 7/11 (now — Narva linn, Pähklimäe tn 7 korteriühistu) brought a debt claim against XX. After service of the claim, no response arrived on time. The court entered judgment by default without a descriptive section or reasoning. Principal, accrued late-payment interest and further late-payment interest of 0.07% per day on principal from 01.03.2016 until full payment were awarded. All procedural costs were imposed on XX; reimbursable costs were fixed at 250 euros and awarded to the association. The court refused an additional 45 euros in legal fees. The provided act does not explain that refusal. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security. The defendant was informed of kaja within 30 days after service or, for public service, after learning of the judgment or enforcement proceedings. The claimant was informed of an appeal to Tartu Ringkonnakohus within 30 days after service, no later than five months after public announcement. The act separately explains that the amount of costs may be challenged where the contested amount exceeds 200 euros. Actual performance or subsequent review is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Principal, accrued late-payment interest, further late-payment interest of 0.07% per day on principal from 01.03.2016 until payment and 250 euros in costs were awarded by default. Recovery of 45 euros in legal fees was refused. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security.
2-15-16874

Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 49 korteriühistu · 80180192

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayBills and justification of chargesPayment accounting and set-offLimitation of claims

Latest prepared act · · № 2-15-16874/21

Editorial summary

The claim against the new owner was partly granted: the oldest claims were excluded by limitation and interest was limited to the period of the buyer’s own delay.

Acts in this casePrepared acts: 1 · Unprepared stages: 1
· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-15-16874/21Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Puškini 49: apartment buyer ordered to pay part of an earlier debt, with interest substantially limited

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Puškini 49 · OÜ Peremaakler · 80180192 · 11523072

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Claimant — KÜ Puškini 49; Defendant — apartment buyer OÜ Peremaakler

Editorial summary

The claim against the new owner was partly granted: the oldest claims were excluded by limitation and interest was limited to the period of the buyer’s own delay.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The apartment association Puškini 49 brought a claim for earlier utility debt and late-payment interest against OÜ Peremaakler, which had bought an apartment at auction. The court partly granted the claim, awarding 2615,28 euros in principal and 21,10 euros* in interest. Each participant bears its own costs, and the association must also pay the state a further 100 euros in missing fees. The association relied on the auction terms and the buyer’s awareness of the debt. The company disputed the calculations and invoked limitation; when paying, it specified the periods covered. An interim judgment of 19 April 2016 had already applied limitation to claims for 2004–2011. The present judgment concerns the remainder. The court proceeded from the company’s acknowledgement of debt from 2012 onwards and checked the charges and payment evidence for 2012 to February 2016. On reconciliation, it determined a balance of 2615,28 euros, accounting for paid invoices and an overpayment in one month. It did not accept the association’s calculation in full. The court rejected interest for the period before purchase on grounds of good faith: in this case, transfer of the principal obligation did not automatically entail liability for the previous owner’s delay. It calculated interest from 24 March 2015, the date on which it recognised the company as owner, using the invoices and its payment dates. The result was 21,10 euros*. The court determined the fee by adding principal and interest: the association had paid 400 euros instead of the 500 euros considered necessary by the court, so it was ordered to pay a further 100 euros. The act does not confirm actual performance of the awards.

Outcome of this decision

Award the association 2615,28 euros in debt and 21,10 euros* in late-payment interest against OÜ Peremaakler. Each party bears its own costs. The association must pay the state a further 100 euros in fees.
Not prepared yet

· Case 2-15-16874 · Viru Maakohus · First instance

2-16-2315

Narva linn, Kreenholmi tn 33 korteriühistu · 80175469

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Editorial summary

Late-payment interest on principal and on litigation costs has different bases and starting points.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-16-2315/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Kreenholmi 33: debt and separate bases for late-payment interest

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Kreenholmi 33 · 80175469

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: claimant — KÜ Kreenholmi 33; defendant — owner XX

Editorial summary

Late-payment interest on principal and on litigation costs has different bases and starting points.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KÜ Kreenholmi 33 (now — Narva linn, Kreenholmi tn 33 korteriühistu). KÜ Kreenholmi 33 claimed management charges and late-payment interest from owner XX. No timely response followed service. The court allowed the claim by default, treating the association’s factual allegations as admitted and the claim as legally justified. The court awarded debt, accrued late-payment interest and costs of 235 euros. Under the operative part, further late-payment interest of 0.07% per day runs on the principal from 1 June 2016 until payment. Separate late-payment interest runs on unpaid costs from the judgment’s entry into force until payment, at the European Central Bank main refinancing rate applicable for each half-year plus eight percentage points annually. The bases and starting points differ. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security but does not establish payment.

Outcome of this decision

Debt, late-payment interest and costs were awarded by default; further late-payment interest on debt and costs runs separately.
2-15-110882

Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 2a korteriühistu · 80245744

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayBills and justification of chargesApartment association board and managementAuthority and representation

Editorial summary

Objections about authority and accounts did not remove the duty to pay established charges.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-15-110882/16Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Narva Sõbralik: objections to authority and charges

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Narva Sõbralik · 80245744

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: claimant — KÜ Narva Sõbralik; defendant — owner XX

Editorial summary

Objections about authority and accounts did not remove the duty to pay established charges.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KÜ Narva Sõbralik (now — Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 2a korteriühistu). KÜ Narva Sõbralik claimed management charges and late-payment interest from owner XX. The defendant disputed the signatory’s authority, the response deadline, the basis for the charge under the articles and the annual accounts. The court confirmed authority using a registry extract as at filing; the order admitting the claim provided a response period. The provision cited by the defendant concerned members’ rights rather than the disputed charge; other comments about accounts were considered irrelevant to this claim. The court found that the association had provided the necessary evidence and there were no substantive objections to the specific debt or calculation. The claim was allowed in simplified proceedings: debt, accrued late-payment interest, further late-payment interest under the operative part of 0.07% per day on principal from 1 August 2015 until payment, and the state fee were awarded. The court considered the objections filed; this was not a default judgment. Performance was not established.

Outcome of this decision

The claim was allowed after examination of the objections; debt, late-payment interest and the state fee were awarded.
2-15-8537

Narva linn, Kreenholmi tn 30 korteriühistu · 80145994

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayPayment accounting and set-off

Latest prepared act · · № 2-15-8537/27

Editorial summary

Payment before judgment precluded a repeated award but left costs to be decided.

Acts in this casePrepared acts: 2 · Unprepared stages: 1
· JudgmentTartu Ringkonnakohus · Appeal · № 2-15-8537/27Read actAppeal

Separate act page

Kreenholmi 30: paid debt and first-instance costs

Judgment · Tartu Ringkonnakohus · Appeal

Korteriühistu Kreenholmi 30 · 80145994

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: claimant and appellant — Korteriühistu Kreenholmi 30; defendant and respondent — owner XX

Editorial summary

Payment before judgment precluded a repeated award but left costs to be decided.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Korteriühistu Kreenholmi 30 (now — Narva linn, Kreenholmi tn 30 korteriühistu). KÜ Kreenholmi 30 appealed the partial allowance of its claim against owner XX. Principal was paid after filing but before judgment; the first-instance court refused to award it again and awarded only accrued late-payment interest. The allocation dispute concerned current invoices and an earlier judicial settlement: payment descriptions distinguished the obligations. The appellate court preserved that result. It rejected the argument that the claim had been admitted: the defendant had not admitted it, and payment before judgment did not justify a fresh award of an extinguished claim. Only costs were changed. As payment followed filing, the defendant’s conduct caused the first-instance costs. The association was awarded 397 euros: a 175-euro state fee and 222 euros for necessary legal assistance. The appeal was allowed in part; each party bears its appeal costs. Payment of principal was established, but payment of late-payment interest and costs was not.

Outcome of this decision

The appeal was allowed in part: paid principal was not awarded again, and the association was awarded 397 euros in first-instance costs.
· JudgmentViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-15-8537/19Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Allocation of payments between current charges and an earlier settlement

Judgment · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Korteriühistu Kreenholmi 30 · 80145994

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Association — claimant; XX — defendant, owner and payer

Editorial summary

The court respected the payer’s stated allocation and distinguished principal from late-payment interest.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Korteriühistu Kreenholmi 30 (now — Narva linn, Kreenholmi tn 30 korteriühistu). Korteriühistu Kreenholmi 30 claimed building management arrears and late-payment interest from XX. The association allocated some payments to an older settlement debt. The court found that payment descriptions clearly distinguished current apartment charges from compliance with the earlier court decision. Giving effect to the payer’s allocation, it treated the principal claimed as paid but allowed accrued late-payment interest. On 15 April 2016, Tartu Ringkonnakohus changed only the allocation of first-instance costs: XX must reimburse the association 397 euros. The findings on payment of principal and the award of late-payment interest remained unchanged.

Outcome of this decision

Only late-payment interest was awarded. The principal was not awarded again because of the proven payments. Initially, each party bore its own costs. On 15 April 2016, Tartu Ringkonnakohus changed only that part: XX must reimburse the association 397 euros in first-instance costs; each party bears its own appeal costs.
Not prepared yet

· Case 2-15-8537 · Viru Maakohus · First instance

2-16-587

Narva linn, Kosmonaudi tn 5 korteriühistu

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayObligations of multiple owners

Editorial summary

The default judgment imposed joint and several liability on three owners.

· JudgmentViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-16-587/11Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Kosmonaudi 5: joint and several award against three owners

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Kosmonaudi 5 · 801701189

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: claimant — KÜ Kosmonaudi 5; three defendants — owners XX

Editorial summary

The default judgment imposed joint and several liability on three owners.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KÜ Kosmonaudi 5 sought management charges and late-payment interest from three owners XX. The claim documents were served, but no substantive responses were filed in time. In the default proceedings, the court treated the association’s factual allegations as admitted and examined their legal basis. The court awarded principal, accrued late-payment interest and costs of 245 euros jointly and severally by default. Performance may be demanded from any debtor, without recovering the same debt repeatedly. Further late-payment interest of 0.07% per day was awarded on the principal from 11 January 2016 until payment. The judgment is immediately enforceable without security and does not establish actual payment.

Outcome of this decision

The claim was allowed by default; debt, late-payment interest and costs were awarded jointly and severally.