Skip to decisions
Žuk — ANTON и JELENA

Narva apartment associations Court decisions

The collection is growing. We explain decisions in accessible language. Browsing by subject helps readers study building management practice, explore similar situations and prevent conflicts.

Materials for studying practice. An editorial summary does not replace an individual legal assessment or promise a dispute outcome.

Subjects and subtopics

A subject describes the dispute; it does not establish a violation.

Additional parameters

Reset all
Case 2-25-115607Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 14 korteriühistu · 80175564

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

How it started · editorial summary

Debtor XX requested a schedule; after transfer, the participants submitted a signed agreement whose dates the court clarified.

· Order approving a settlement and ending proceedingsViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-25-115607/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Kangelaste prospekt 14: instalments and late-payment interest

Order approving a settlement and ending proceedings · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 14 korteriühistu · 80175564

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 14 korteriühistu; Debtor — XX

How it started · editorial summary

Debtor XX requested a schedule; after transfer, the participants submitted a signed agreement whose dates the court clarified.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 14 korteriühistu sought a debt from XX through expedited payment-order proceedings. XX objected and requested a schedule. No agreement was initially submitted, so the case went to Viru Maakohus, which allowed time to correct the application or settle. On 8 August 2025, the participants submitted a signed settlement. The court approved a total obligation including costs and monthly payments. Its separate components and the reasons for reducing it from the original claim are not disclosed. The court removed a repeated date in the draft schedule so that only one payment fell in each month. This was the court’s own correction, which it considered did not alter the settlement’s substance. Delay attracts late-payment interest of 0.1% per day on the amount paid late. This is not an automatic acceleration of the whole balance. After proper performance, the association has no remaining property claims under the agreement. Proceedings ended; each bears other costs. The agreed appeal period is one day from service. Actual payment is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Approve the settlement covering the total debt including costs, monthly payments and late-payment interest of 0.1% per day on amounts paid late. The court corrected the repeated date and ended the proceedings.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
3. End the civil proceedings. […] 4. Leave each participant to bear litigation costs not specified in the settlement. There are no litigation costs to be reimbursed.
First instance
Case 2-25-111135Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Malmi tn 4 korteriühistu · 80189939

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

How it started · editorial summary

After payment-order proceedings began, the association and debtor XX agreed on the acknowledged obligation and additional time to pay.

· Order approving a settlementViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-25-111135/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Malmi tn 4: acknowledgment of debt and additional time to pay

Order approving a settlement · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Malmi tn 4 korteriühistu · 80189939

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, Malmi tn 4 korteriühistu; Debtor — XX

How it started · editorial summary

After payment-order proceedings began, the association and debtor XX agreed on the acknowledged obligation and additional time to pay.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Malmi tn 4 korteriühistu sought payment of debt and costs through expedited payment-order proceedings. After service of a payment proposal, the participants agreed on the obligation and instalments. Their signed text was submitted for approval and the case transferred from Pärnu Maakohus to Viru Maakohus. On 5 August 2025, the court approved the settlement. XX acknowledged unpaid management costs and accrued late-payment interest; the obligation also includes 25 euros in state fees and 166.80 euros in legal costs. The association granted additional time for fifteen voluntary monthly payments. Breach makes the entire obligation immediately payable. On breach, the association may demand the agreed late-payment interest of 0.02% per day on the originally acknowledged management-cost principal from 1 July 2025. The court found the settlement permissible and enforceable and ended the case. Participants bear other costs. The order does not establish that payments were made.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly payment of the acknowledged debt, late-payment interest, 25 euros in state fees and 166.80 euros in legal costs. Breach triggers immediate payment and late-payment interest of 0.02% per day on the originally acknowledged management-cost principal from 1 July 2025. End proceedings.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
1.4. The debtor acknowledges the obligation specified in clause 1.3 of the settlement. […] 2. End the proceedings in civil case no. 2-25-111135.
First instance
Case 2-25-112830Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Rakvere tn 20, Rakvere tn 20a, Rakvere tn 20b, Rakvere tn 20c korteriühistu · 80180335

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesPayment accounting and set-offLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

How it started · editorial summary

The association and XX agreed on instalments, priority allocation of payments and the consequences of delay.

· Order approving a settlement and ending proceedingsViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-25-112830/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Rakvere tn 20 and associated buildings: allocation of instalment payments

Order approving a settlement and ending proceedings · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Rakvere tn 20, Rakvere tn 20a, Rakvere tn 20b, Rakvere tn 20c korteriühistu · 80180335

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, Rakvere tn 20, Rakvere tn 20a, Rakvere tn 20b, Rakvere tn 20c korteriühistu; Debtor — XX

How it started · editorial summary

The association and XX agreed on instalments, priority allocation of payments and the consequences of delay.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Rakvere tn 20, Rakvere tn 20a, Rakvere tn 20b, Rakvere tn 20c korteriühistu sought a debt from XX. After service of a payment proposal, the participants agreed on the obligation and instalment terms. The case was transferred to Viru Maakohus, which approved the settlement and ended proceedings without deciding the original dispute on its merits. The acknowledged obligation includes utility and management arrears, late-payment interest and association costs. Monthly instalments and a separate final payment are required. Current bills are payable in addition. If a transfer cannot cover both the current bill and the instalment, it is applied to the settlement first. Current bills remain payable. A delay exceeding 15 days permits recovery of the entire unpaid balance through enforcement. Those 15 days also constitute the additional period for performance; no further period is required. Participants bear other costs themselves. They waived appeal; the order’s entry into force is linked to service. Performance of the schedule is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Approve instalments and end the proceedings. Current bills remain payable separately; an insufficient transfer is applied to the settlement first. A delay exceeding 15 days permits recovery of the whole balance; those days already constitute the additional performance period. Each participant bears other costs.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. End the proceedings in civil case no. 2-25-112830. […] 3. The parties’ litigation costs have been determined in the settlement. Other litigation costs incurred by the parties remain for each to bear.
First instance
Case 2-24-137344Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Vahtra tn 6 korteriühistu · 80181027

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

How it started · editorial summary

After payment-order proceedings began, the association and debtor XX agreed on acknowledgment of the debt and instalments.

· Order approving a settlement and ending proceedingsViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-24-137344/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Vahtra tn 6: acknowledgment of debt and instalment terms

Order approving a settlement and ending proceedings · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Vahtra tn 6 korteriühistu · 80181027

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, Vahtra tn 6 korteriühistu; Debtor — XX

How it started · editorial summary

After payment-order proceedings began, the association and debtor XX agreed on acknowledgment of the debt and instalments.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved the settlement between Narva linn, Vahtra tn 6 korteriühistu and XX and ended the case after transfer from payment-order proceedings. The agreement followed service of the payment proposal. XX acknowledged management-cost and late-payment interest liabilities, also including 25 euros in state fees and 166.80 euros in legal costs. The association granted additional time for ten voluntary monthly payments. The first deadline precedes submission and approval of the agreement; the source does not confirm that this payment was made. Breach of the schedule makes the whole obligation immediately payable. The association may claim the agreed late-payment interest of 0.03% per day on the originally acknowledged principal from 1 March 2025. The court found the terms permissible and enforceable without separately deciding the original dispute on its merits. Each bears other costs; an appeal was possible within 15 days of service. Performance is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly payments and end proceedings. Breach makes the obligation immediately payable and permits the association to claim the agreed late-payment interest of 0.03% per day on the originally acknowledged principal from 1 March 2025. Each participant bears other costs.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
1.4. The debtor acknowledges the obligation specified in clause 1.3 of the settlement. […] 2. End the proceedings in civil case no. 2-24-137344.
First instance
Case 2-24-142703Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 21 korteriühistu · 80228958

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedulesPayment accounting and set-off

How it started · editorial summary

Two persons XX agreed on instalments and payment allocation.

· Court orderViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-24-142703/8Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Instalments and allocation of insufficient payments

Court order · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 21 korteriühistu · 80228958

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 21 korteriühistu; two persons concerned XX — joint and several debtors

How it started · editorial summary

Two persons XX agreed on instalments and payment allocation.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved a settlement between Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 21 korteriühistu and two persons XX for joint and several payment of utility and management charges, interest and costs. The unpaid balance may be claimed from either debtor without double recovery. Proceedings were terminated. Ten equal monthly instalments are due by the last day of each month. The association reported that the first two had been paid; this does not establish full performance. Current bills must be paid separately. If a payment cannot cover both the instalment and the current bill, it is allocated to the settlement. An instalment overdue by more than 15 days permits immediate enforcement of the unpaid balance. Other costs remain with each participant. The participants excluded an appeal.

Outcome of this decision

Approve joint and several instalments and terminate proceedings; insufficient payments go towards the settlement, and a delay over 15 days permits recovery of the balance.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case no. 2-24-142703.
First instance
Case 2-24-147402Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Kosmonaudi tn 3 korteriühistu · 80162834

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesPayment accounting and set-offLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

How it started · editorial summary

XX and the association agreed on instalments with priority for current bills.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-24-147402/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Instalments and payments exceeding current bills

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Kosmonaudi tn 3 korteriühistu · 80162834

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Kosmonaudi tn 3 korteriühistu; person concerned XX — debtor

How it started · editorial summary

XX and the association agreed on instalments with priority for current bills.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved a settlement between Narva linn, Kosmonaudi tn 3 korteriühistu and owner XX covering acknowledged utility and management-charge debt and late-payment interest, and terminated proceedings. Costs are 208 euros: a 25-euro state fee and 183 euros in legal costs. The association waived other claims. Twenty months of varying instalments and early payment were agreed. Current undisputed bills must be paid separately; only the excess counts towards the settlement. Any full or partial delay in an instalment permits enforcement of the whole unpaid balance. Performance extinguishes mutual claims in this case. Other costs remain with each participant. The appeal period was reduced to two days after service. Performance is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Settlement approved and proceedings terminated; only amounts exceeding current bills go towards the existing debt.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case no. 2-24-147402.
First instance
Case 2-24-122465Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Madise tn 6 korteriühistu · 80551777

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The association Madise tn 6 sought a debt; the case was transferred from payment-order proceedings after submission of a settlement.

· Order approving a settlementViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-24-122465/6Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Madise tn 6: agreed schedule and current bills

Order approving a settlement · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Madise tn 6 korteriühistu · 80551777

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, Madise tn 6 korteriühistu; Person concerned, debtor — XX

How it started · editorial summary

The association Madise tn 6 sought a debt; the case was transferred from payment-order proceedings after submission of a settlement.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Madise tn 6 korteriühistu sought a debt through expedited payment-order proceedings. The participants submitted an agreement, after which Pärnu Maakohus transferred the case to Viru Maakohus. The association formalised its claim as instructed, and XX later resubmitted a signed settlement. XX stated that the earlier schedule was being followed. The participants fixed the debt and agreed eleven monthly payments. XX additionally undertook to reimburse 25 euros in state fees and 20 euros in costs by the agreed deadline. These 45 euros are outside the schedule amount. Current bills remain payable. The court found the settlement permissible and enforceable, approved it and ended the case. Each bears other costs. Some scheduled dates had already passed, but approval does not establish which payments were received. The statement about performance was XX’s. The underlying monetary dispute was not separately adjudicated.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly repayment of the debt. XX must additionally reimburse 45 euros in costs by the agreed deadline and pay current bills. End proceedings; allocate agreed costs accordingly and leave other costs to the participants.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. End the proceedings in civil case no. 2-24-122465.
First instance
Case 2-23-15764Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 30 korteriühistu · 80171069

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

Weki Ehitus OÜ brought a debt claim against the apartment association Kangelaste prospekt 30; the parties submitted their settlement of 08.05.2024.

· Ruling approving a settlement and terminating proceedingsViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-23-15764/21Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Weki Ehitus OÜ and apartment association Kangelaste prospekt 30 agreed three payments and costs

Ruling approving a settlement and terminating proceedings · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Weki Ehitus OÜ · Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 30 korteriühistu · 12905657 · 80171069

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: claimant — Weki Ehitus OÜ; defendant — Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 30 korteriühistu

How it started · editorial summary

Weki Ehitus OÜ brought a debt claim against the apartment association Kangelaste prospekt 30; the parties submitted their settlement of 08.05.2024.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Viru Maakohus was hearing Weki Ehitus OÜ’s debt claim against Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 30 korteriühistu. On 8 May 2024 the parties submitted a signed settlement and requested approval. The ruling does not describe the contract, specific construction works or quality objections, so the claimant’s name cannot establish the nature of the disputed services. The association agreed to pay 5 697,19 euros, comprising 4 979,20 euros in principal, 430,63 euros in interest as of 7 November 2023 and 287,36 euros for 8 November 2023 to 26 April 2024. Three payments were agreed: 1 899 euros by the end of May and again by the end of June 2024 and 1 899,19 euros by the end of July. Separately, by 31 July the association reimburses 1 275 euros in claimant costs: a 315 euro fee and 960 euros in representative remuneration. The court found no conflict with the law or good morals, approved the agreement and terminated proceedings. It explained compulsory enforcement for non-performance and the consequences of termination for a repeated claim between the same parties. It separately ordered half the fee paid, 315 euros, refunded to the claimant from the budget. This refund is not another association obligation. The parties also agreed a shortened two-day appeal period against the ruling after service.

Outcome of this decision

Approve the association’s obligation to pay 5 697,19 euros in three payments by 31.07.2024 and a separate 1 275 euros in costs by the same date. Terminate proceedings and allocate costs under the agreement. Refund the claimant a 315 euro fee after entry into force.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings on Weki Ehitus OÜ’s debt claim against Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 30 korteriühistu.
First instance
Case 2-23-151610Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Partisani tn 3 korteriühistu · 80175376

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

Three persons XX agreed to repay a joint and several debt to the association by instalments.

· Court orderViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-23-151610/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Joint and several debt repayment by instalments

Court order · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Partisani tn 3 korteriühistu · 80175376

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Partisani tn 3 korteriühistu; three persons concerned XX — joint and several debtors

How it started · editorial summary

Three persons XX agreed to repay a joint and several debt to the association by instalments.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Partisani tn 3 korteriühistu sought payment of a debt from three persons XX. The court approved their settlement and terminated proceedings without deciding the original dispute on its merits. Liability is joint and several: the unpaid balance may be claimed from any debtor, without recovering the same sum twice. Debt and late-payment interest are payable by monthly instalments; the obligation includes 100 euros, representing half of the expedited payment-order costs, and 50 euros in collection costs. A delay in more than two instalments allows enforcement of the balance through a bailiff. Other costs remain with the participants; 100 euros in state fees are to be refunded to the association. The participants excluded an appeal. Subsequent performance is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Settlement approved and proceedings terminated; the balance may be enforced if more than two instalments are overdue.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case no. 2-23-151610.
First instance
Case 2-24-100102Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Pähklimäe tn 9 korteriühistu · 80175328

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

How it started · editorial summary

The association and debtor XX agreed to repay the debt by instalments. The court approved the settlement and ended proceedings.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-24-100102/6Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Pähklimäe tn 9: debt instalments and consequences of breach

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Pähklimäe tn 9 korteriühistu · 80175328

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, Pähklimäe tn 9 korteriühistu; Person concerned, debtor and settlement party — XX; Association’s representative — XX

How it started · editorial summary

The association and debtor XX agreed to repay the debt by instalments. The court approved the settlement and ended proceedings.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved a settlement between Narva linn, Pähklimäe tn 9 korteriühistu and debtor XX for payment by instalments. Proceedings ended on the agreed terms. The association initially sought a payment order for debt, late-payment interest and costs. After service, the parties submitted a settlement. The case went to Viru Maakohus, which requested clarification and considered the signed version. The order does not describe substantive objections to the charges. The debtor acknowledged management-cost arrears, accrued late-payment interest, 65 euros in state fees and 148.20 euros in legal costs. Monthly instalments were agreed. Breach allows the association to enforce the entire unpaid balance and claim late-payment interest of 0.03% per day on unpaid management costs. This is a term for a possible breach, not a finding that breach occurred. The court approved the lawful, permissible settlement on 19 February 2024. Each bears unspecified costs. The underlying charging dispute was not separately adjudicated. Approval of the schedule proves neither payment nor that the debt remains outstanding today.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly instalments covering debt, accrued late-payment interest, 65 euros in state fees and 148.20 euros in legal costs. On breach, the association may enforce the balance and claim 0.03% daily late-payment interest on unpaid management costs. Participants bear unspecified costs. End proceedings.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Leave each party to bear litigation costs not specified in the settlement.
First instance
Case 2-23-113419Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Uusküla tn 13 korteriühistu · 80015116

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

Following partial payment of utility arrears, the participants agreed on the balance. The court approved the settlement but refused a refund of the payment-order fee.

· Order approving a settlement and ending proceedingsViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-23-113419/14Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Uusküla tn 13: outstanding debt and the state-fee refund

Order approving a settlement and ending proceedings · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Uusküla tn 13 korteriühistu · 80015116

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, Uusküla tn 13 korteriühistu; Person concerned — XX

How it started · editorial summary

Following partial payment of utility arrears, the participants agreed on the balance. The court approved the settlement but refused a refund of the payment-order fee.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Uusküla tn 13 korteriühistu sought utility arrears. After unsuccessful service of a payment proposal, the case went to the county court. The association reported partial repayment and the participants agreed on payment of the balance. XX agreed to pay the balance and, separately, 385.50 euros in costs within two months after the order enters into force, by instalments or in a single payment. Current bills remain payable; XX bears XX’s own costs. The court approved the settlement and ended the case. Each bears other costs, which were not separately quantified. Subsequent payment is not established. The association was refused a refund of 32.50 euros, half the 65-euro state fee. The fee had been paid in expedited payment-order proceedings; no additional fee was paid at county-court stage. The court applied a non-refund rule effective from February 2023. The general appeal period was reduced to two days; refusal of the fee refund was separately declared unappealable.

Outcome of this decision

Approve payment of the agreed debt balance and, separately, 385.50 euros in costs within two months after the order enters into force, by instalments or in one payment. Current bills remain payable. End proceedings; each bears other costs. Refuse the 32.50-euro state-fee refund.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. End the proceedings in civil case no. 2-23-113419.
First instance
Case 2-23-135924Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 69 korteriühistu · 80426523

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved monthly instalments. Additional time for voluntary payment depends on compliance with the schedule; performance is not established.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-23-135924/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

A. Puškini tn 69: additional time to pay the debt

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 69 korteriühistu · 80426523

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 69 korteriühistu; Debtor, party to the settlement — XX; Association’s representative — XX

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved monthly instalments. Additional time for voluntary payment depends on compliance with the schedule; performance is not established.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 69 korteriühistu and XX agreed to pay an acknowledged obligation by instalments. The court approved the settlement and ended proceedings. The participants submitted their written agreement before a payment order was issued; the papers were transferred to Viru Maakohus for approval. The order contains no independent examination of objections to the charges. The obligation includes management costs, other payments, late-payment interest and litigation costs. The association granted additional time for voluntary payment: equal monthly instalments and a separate final payment. A breach requires immediate performance of the entire agreed obligation; the association may claim late-payment interest of 0.02% per day from 1 October 2023 on unpaid management costs and other payments. The court checked that the terms were permissible and enforceable. Each participant bears other costs. The settlement is not a separate ruling that every charge was proved; actual performance of the schedule is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly instalments with a separate final payment. Breach requires immediate performance of the entire agreed obligation; the association may claim late-payment interest of 0.02% per day from 1 October 2023 on unpaid management costs and other payments. End proceedings, allocate agreed costs accordingly and leave other costs to each participant.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. End the proceedings in civil case no. 2-23-135924.
First instance