Skip to decisions
Žuk — ANTON и JELENA

Narva apartment associations Court decisions

The collection is growing. We explain decisions in accessible language. Browsing by subject helps readers study building management practice, explore similar situations and prevent conflicts.

Materials for studying practice. An editorial summary does not replace an individual legal assessment or promise a dispute outcome.

Subjects and subtopics

A subject describes the dispute; it does not establish a violation.

Additional parameters

Reset all
Case 2-26-111446Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, V. Gerassimovi tn 16 korteriühistu · 80218960

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

Under its terms, breach of the schedule permits the association to treat the agreement as invalid.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-26-111446/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

V. Gerassimovi tn 16: a year of instalments by settlement

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, V. Gerassimovi tn 16 korteriühistu · 80218960

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, V. Gerassimovi tn 16 korteriühistu; person concerned — debtor XX; applicant representative — XX

How it started · editorial summary

Under its terms, breach of the schedule permits the association to treat the agreement as invalid.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, V. Gerassimovi tn 16 korteriühistu and debtor XX submitted a written settlement after service of a payment proposal in expedited payment-order proceedings. The case was transferred from Pärnu Maakohus to Viru Maakohus for approval. The court examined permissibility and enforceability, approved the settlement before non-contentious proceedings began and discontinued the case. The debtor acknowledged management and utility arrears payable over twelve months. The agreement does not release the debtor from current monthly payments. On improper performance, including full or partial non-payment of at least one scheduled instalment, the association may unilaterally treat the agreement as invalid. The order approves that condition but does not establish its actual use or performance of the schedule. Each party bears its own costs without reimbursement.

Outcome of this decision

A twelve-month settlement schedule was approved and the case discontinued. Current payments remain due.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
3. Discontinue the civil proceedings.
First instance
Case 2-26-110879Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Soldina tn 18c korteriühistu · 80061091

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The settlement distinguishes scheduled debt from the statement about current charges.

· Court orderViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-26-110879/4Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Soldina tn 18c: instalments and limits of enforcement

Court order · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Soldina tn 18c korteriühistu · 80061091

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Soldina tn 18c korteriühistu; two persons concerned — debtors XX

How it started · editorial summary

The settlement distinguishes scheduled debt from the statement about current charges.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Soldina tn 18c korteriühistu sought payment from two debtors XX in expedited payment-order proceedings. The proposed schedule contained additional conditions, so the case was transferred to Viru Maakohus. After clarification, the participants submitted a new settlement, which the court approved before non-contentious proceedings began and discontinued the case. The acknowledged obligation includes principal, late-payment interest and costs, with six monthly payments. Initial dates precede the order, but performance was not established. A delay exceeding ten calendar days permits the association to seek enforcement of the judicial settlement. The statement about current charges expressly creates no independently enforceable obligation under this settlement. After the final payment, the debt is treated as paid. Additional costs remain with the participants.

Outcome of this decision

Six payments were approved; delay exceeding ten days permits an enforcement application. The case was discontinued.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
3. Discontinue the civil proceedings.
First instance
Case 2-26-110970Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Rakvere tn 36 korteriühistu · 80175446

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved an acknowledged obligation with instalments and conditional late-payment interest.

· Court orderViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-26-110970/4Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Rakvere tn 36: instalments and consequences of breaching settlement

Court order · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Rakvere tn 36 korteriühistu · 80175446

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Rakvere tn 36 korteriühistu; debtor XX

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved an acknowledged obligation with instalments and conditional late-payment interest.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Rakvere tn 36 korteriühistu sought management charges and late-payment interest in expedited payment-order proceedings. After service of the payment proposal, debtor XX and the association submitted a written settlement. The claim was transferred from Pärnu Maakohus to Viru Maakohus, which approved the settlement before starting to examine the underlying debt application and discontinued the case. The acknowledged obligation includes debt, accrued late-payment interest, a state fee of 25 euros and legal costs of 166.80 euros. Payment was deferred into twelve equal monthly instalments. Breach of the schedule makes the entire obligation immediately payable; upon breach, the association may also claim late-payment interest of 0.02% per day solely on the principal specified in the settlement, running from 1 June 2026. Costs outside the settlement remain with each party. The order does not establish payment of future instalments.

Outcome of this decision

The settlement was approved and proceedings discontinued. Breach triggers immediate payment and conditional late-payment interest.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
3. Discontinue the civil proceedings.
First instance
Case 2-25-124523Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Linda tn 1 korteriühistu · 80180424

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The schedule does not establish payment; the settlement takes effect when the order becomes final.

· Court orderViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-25-124523/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Linda tn 1: instalments and shortened appeal period

Court order · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Linda tn 1 korteriühistu · 80180424

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Linda tn 1 korteriühistu; person concerned — debtor XX

How it started · editorial summary

The schedule does not establish payment; the settlement takes effect when the order becomes final.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Linda tn 1 korteriühistu and debtor XX submitted a settlement following the start of expedited payment-order proceedings. The court approved it before non-contentious proceedings began and discontinued the case. The acknowledged obligation covers utility and management-charge arrears and agreed costs; the association waived other claims. Payment is spread over 28 months, with early payment permitted. Some initial dates precede the order, but it does not establish performance. Full or partial delay in an instalment makes the entire unpaid balance recoverable in enforcement proceedings. Full performance leaves no mutual claims from this case. The settlement takes effect when the approving order becomes final; a separate effectiveness clause was removed. By agreement, the appeal period was shortened to two days from service. Costs outside the settlement remain with each participant.

Outcome of this decision

The settlement was approved and proceedings discontinued; breach of the 28-month schedule permits recovery of the balance.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
3. Discontinue the civil proceedings.
First instance
Case 2-25-128001Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 12 korteriühistu · 80175498

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved an acknowledged obligation with instalments and conditional late-payment interest.

· Court orderViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-25-128001/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Kangelaste prospekt 12: instalments and consequences of breaching settlement

Court order · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 12 korteriühistu · 80175498

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 12 korteriühistu; person concerned XX — debtor, party to the settlement; applicant’s representative XX

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved an acknowledged obligation with instalments and conditional late-payment interest.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 12 korteriühistu sought management charges and late-payment interest in expedited payment-order proceedings. After service of the payment proposal, debtor XX and the association submitted a written settlement. The claim was transferred from Pärnu Maakohus to Viru Maakohus, which approved the settlement before starting to examine the underlying debt application and discontinued the case. The acknowledged obligation includes debt, accrued late-payment interest, a state fee of 25 euros and legal costs of 166.80 euros. Payment was deferred into seventeen monthly instalments of varying amounts. Breach of the schedule makes the entire obligation immediately payable; upon breach, the association may also claim late-payment interest of 0.02% per day solely on the principal specified in the settlement, running from 1 March 2026. Costs outside the settlement remain with each party. The order does not establish payment of future instalments.

Outcome of this decision

The settlement was approved and proceedings discontinued. Breach triggers immediate payment and conditional late-payment interest.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
3. Discontinue the civil proceedings.
First instance
Case 2-25-123890Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Vahtra tn 6 korteriühistu · 80181027

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved an acknowledged obligation with instalments and conditional late-payment interest.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-25-123890/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Vahtra tn 6: instalments and consequences of breaching settlement

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Vahtra tn 6 korteriühistu · 80181027

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Vahtra tn 6 korteriühistu; two joint and several debtors XX

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved an acknowledged obligation with instalments and conditional late-payment interest.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Vahtra tn 6 korteriühistu sought management charges and late-payment interest in expedited payment-order proceedings. After service of the payment proposal, two joint and several debtors XX and the association submitted a written settlement. The claim was transferred from Pärnu Maakohus to Viru Maakohus, which approved the settlement before starting to examine the underlying debt application and discontinued the case. The acknowledged obligation includes debt, accrued late-payment interest, a state fee of 25 euros and legal costs of 166.80 euros. Payment was deferred into twelve monthly instalments. Breach of the schedule makes the entire obligation immediately payable; upon breach, the association may also claim late-payment interest of 0.02% per day solely on the principal specified in the settlement, running from 1 January 2026. Costs outside the settlement remain with each party. The order does not establish payment of future instalments. Joint and several liability permits recovery from any debtor without recovering the same debt twice.

Outcome of this decision

The settlement was approved and proceedings discontinued. Breach triggers immediate payment and conditional late-payment interest.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
3. Discontinue the civil proceedings.
First instance
Case 2-25-14771Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Joala tn 13, Joala tn 15, Kose tn 1a, Kose tn 3 korteriühistu · 80170785

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The agreed costs are included in the schedule; delay permits recovery of the balance.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-25-14771/10Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Joala–Kose: settlement on payment of arrears

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Joala tn 13, Joala tn 15, Kose tn 1a, Kose tn 3 korteriühistu · 80170785

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Joala tn 13, Joala tn 15, Kose tn 1a, Kose tn 3 korteriühistu; person concerned — debtor XX

How it started · editorial summary

The agreed costs are included in the schedule; delay permits recovery of the balance.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Joala tn 13, Joala tn 15, Kose tn 1a, Kose tn 3 korteriühistu and debtor XX submitted a settlement concerning management charges and late-payment interest. The court found it permissible and capable of performance, approved it and discontinued proceedings. The acknowledged obligation includes 25 euros in agreed litigation costs. This is already included in the schedule and is not recoverable again separately. There are 27 payments of varying amounts, including higher seasonal payments; larger payments are permitted. An insufficient or late payment makes the entire unpaid balance recoverable through a bailiff. Full performance leaves no additional claims arising from this case. Other costs remain with each party; a refund of 25 euros, half the state fee, is ordered to the association after the order’s entry into force. The order does not establish performance of the schedule.

Outcome of this decision

A settlement with 27 payments and acceleration of the balance on breach was approved; proceedings were discontinued.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Discontinue the civil proceedings.
First instance
Case 2-25-102277Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 49 korteriühistu · 80162811

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

Owner XX and the association agreed on instalments after the debt claim was contested.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-25-102277/28Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Instalments and waiver of accrued interest

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 49 korteriühistu · 80162811

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 49 korteriühistu; person concerned, apartment owner — XX

How it started · editorial summary

Owner XX and the association agreed on instalments after the debt claim was contested.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Kangelaste prospekt 49 korteriühistu claimed management-charge arrears and interest from owner XX. Following an objection, the payment-order case was transferred and the claim amended. The court approved the participants’ settlement and terminated proceedings without deciding the original dispute on its merits. XX undertook to pay the debt and 750 euros of the association’s costs in twelve monthly instalments. The association waived accrued interest. Current bills must be paid separately on time. Delay in at least two instalments, or another breach of the instalment condition, allows immediate recovery of the balance and interest at 0.02%; the text specifies no period for that rate. Proper performance leaves no association claim for the period covered by the settlement. Other costs remain with the participants; the appeal period was reduced to one day after service.

Outcome of this decision

Settlement on instalments and costs approved with a waiver of accrued interest; proceedings terminated.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case no. 2-25-102277.
First instance
Case 2-25-120462Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Mõisa tn 3 korteriühistu · 80152244

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

Following an objection in payment-order proceedings, the association and XX submitted a clarified agreement acknowledging debt and setting instalments.

· Order approving a settlementViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-25-120462/7Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Mõisa tn 3: instalments for utility and management arrears

Order approving a settlement · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, Mõisa tn 3 korteriühistu · 80152244

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, Mõisa tn 3 korteriühistu; Person concerned, debtor — XX

How it started · editorial summary

Following an objection in payment-order proceedings, the association and XX submitted a clarified agreement acknowledging debt and setting instalments.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Mõisa tn 3 korteriühistu began payment-order proceedings against XX. XX objected in time and later corrected a missing signature. The case went to Viru Maakohus. The participants submitted a settlement and clarified it at the court’s suggestion. On 16 October 2025, the court approved the amended text before considering the debt application itself. It covers utility and management costs. XX acknowledged the principal and agreed to reimburse 45 euros in costs: 25 euros in state fees and 20 euros in other procedural costs. Twenty-two monthly payments and early repayment were permitted. Full or partial delay makes the entire unpaid balance enforceable. Regular payment of current costs remains required. After performance, no mutual claims remain in the case. The court found the terms permissible and enforceable and ended proceedings. Each bears other costs. The agreed appeal period was two days from service. Performance of the schedule is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly payment of the principal and 45 euros in costs. Full or partial delay makes the entire unpaid balance enforceable. Current costs remain payable. End proceedings.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2.5. If instalments specified in clause 2.2 are delayed, including in part, the entire unpaid debt is recoverable in enforcement proceedings (compulsory enforcement). […] 3. End the civil proceedings.
First instance
Case 2-25-117353Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, V. Gerassimovi tn 16 korteriühistu · 80218960

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The association and XX agreed on instalments and a specific term concerning breach of the schedule.

· Order approving a settlement and ending proceedingsViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-25-117353/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

V. Gerassimovi tn 16: debt and breach of the payment schedule

Order approving a settlement and ending proceedings · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, V. Gerassimovi tn 16 korteriühistu · 80218960

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, V. Gerassimovi tn 16 korteriühistu; Debtor — XX

How it started · editorial summary

The association and XX agreed on instalments and a specific term concerning breach of the schedule.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, V. Gerassimovi tn 16 korteriühistu sought a debt from XX. After service of the payment proposal, the participants submitted an agreement. Pärnu Maakohus ended expedited payment-order proceedings and transferred the case to Viru Maakohus. On 16 September 2025, the court approved the acknowledgment of utility arrears and monthly payments over one year. Current bills remain payable. On breach, including failure to pay at least one instalment in full or in part, the agreement allows the association unilaterally to treat it as invalid. This operative part has no separate clause making the entire balance immediately recoverable. The court found the settlement permissible and enforceable and ended the case without deciding the original dispute on its merits. Participants bear costs outside the agreement; no additional reimbursement was awarded. An appeal was possible within 15 days of service. Subsequent payment is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Approve acknowledgment of the debt and monthly payments. Current bills remain payable. On breach, the association may unilaterally treat the agreement as invalid. End proceedings; participants bear costs outside the agreement.

A checked extract in this language is not yet available.

First instance
Case 2-24-145726Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 46 korteriühistu · 80170555

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

How it started · editorial summary

Two persons XX agreed on joint and several instalments with the association.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-24-145726/7Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Joint and several instalments and breach consequences

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 46 korteriühistu · 80170555

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 46 korteriühistu; two persons concerned XX — joint and several debtors; applicant representative XX

How it started · editorial summary

Two persons XX agreed on joint and several instalments with the association.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved a settlement between Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 46 korteriühistu and two persons XX and terminated proceedings. The settlement preceded the order; participants confirmed compliance with the schedule as of August. This does not establish full repayment or absence of later default. Liability is joint and several: the unpaid balance may be claimed from either debtor without double recovery. The obligation includes management-charge debt, accrued late-payment interest, a 25-euro fee and 166.80 euros in legal costs, payable in thirteen instalments. Breach makes the whole obligation immediately payable and entitles the association to late-payment interest of 0.03% per day on the unpaid management-cost amount specified in the interest clause from 1 January 2025. The general costs clause leaves costs with participants; no separate reimbursement beyond the settlement was ordered.

Outcome of this decision

Settlement approved and proceedings terminated; joint and several instalments and conditional late-payment interest retained.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case no. 2-24-145726.
First instance
Case 2-25-117421Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 5 korteriühistu · 80180523

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesPayment accounting and set-off

How it started · editorial summary

The settlement provides for instalments and applies only payments exceeding current undisputed bills to the old debt.

· Order approving a settlementViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-25-117421/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

A. Puškini tn 5: instalments and allocation of current payments

Order approving a settlement · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 5 korteriühistu · 80180523

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 5 korteriühistu; Debtor — XX

How it started · editorial summary

The settlement provides for instalments and applies only payments exceeding current undisputed bills to the old debt.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, A. Puškini tn 5 korteriühistu brought a claim against XX in payment-order proceedings. The participants agreed on the debt and payment, submitted a settlement and requested termination. Following transfer from Pärnu Maakohus, Viru Maakohus approved it on 27 August 2025. XX acknowledged the principal and undertook to reimburse 45 euros in association costs: 25 euros in state fees and 20 euros in other procedural costs. The association waived other claims. There are 33 monthly payments with seasonal amounts: higher from May to October and lower from November to April, with a separate final amount. Early payment is permitted. Performance of the schedule is not established. Current undisputed bills must be paid in addition: only the excess above them counts toward the old debt under the settlement. Full or partial delay in an instalment makes the entire unpaid balance enforceable. After performance, no mutual claims remain in the case. The court found the settlement permissible and enforceable and ended proceedings. Each participant bears other costs. The agreed appeal period was shortened to two days from service.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly payment of the principal and 45 euros in costs. Current undisputed bills remain separately payable; only the excess is applied to old debt. Full or partial delay makes the entire unpaid balance enforceable. End proceedings; participants bear other costs.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
1.5. If instalments specified in clause 1.2 are delayed, including in part, the entire unpaid debt is recoverable in enforcement proceedings (compulsory enforcement). […] 2. End the proceedings in civil case no. 2-25-117421.
First instance