Damages claimed for an alleged leak after roof repairs
KÜ KRAAVI 12 · 80310766
Participants and roles: XX — claimant, owner; Association — defendant
How it started · editorial summary
The alleged damage after repairs was not found proven.
The dispute and the court’s decision
KÜ KRAAVI 12 (now — Narva linn, Kraavi tn 12 korteriühistu). XX sought compensation from KÜ KRAAVI 12 for damage to interior finishes allegedly caused by roof repairs. The association disputed the leak and the loss claimed. The court disregarded Russian-language documents lacking the translation it had requested, could not establish where or when the photographs were taken, and considered testimony from witnesses who saw no flood damage. Its concluding reasons find the damage unproven.
Outcome of this decision
The operative part dismisses the claim in full. The concluding reasons find no proof of damage and therefore do not examine the other conditions of liability. The claimant bears the association’s costs, to be quantified separately.
A checked extract in this language is not yet available.