Default judgment awarding enforcement costs
Korteriühistu Tallinna mnt 21 Narva ·
Participants and roles: Association — claimant; XX — defendant
Editorial summary
This short judgment concerns enforcement costs and does not establish the subject of the original debt.
The dispute and the court’s decision
Korteriühistu Tallinna mnt 21 Narva sought reimbursement from XX of enforcement costs it had paid. The court granted the claim by default because the defendant received the claim personally but did not respond in time. The judgment has no descriptive part or reasons.
Outcome of this decision
Enforcement costs were awarded against XX. The defendant bears procedural costs, but there are no costs to quantify. The default judgment is immediately enforceable; actual enforcement is not established.