Skip to decisions
Žuk — ANTON и JELENA
Back to decisions

Võidu 7: assignment of debt and inadequate calculation of some late-payment interest

Viru Maakohus · First instance

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayBills and justification of chargesContracts and services

Võidu 7: assignment of debt and inadequate calculation of some late-payment interest

Judgment · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Auvõlg OÜ · KÜ Võidu 7 · 11901152 ·

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: claimant — assignee Auvõlg OÜ; defendant — owner XX; original creditor — KÜ Võidu 7

How it started · editorial summary

An established assignment does not replace proof of the late-payment interest calculation.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KÜ Võidu 7 assigned its management-charge claims against owner XX to Auvõlg OÜ. The court found the assignment, ownership and principal debt established; the new creditor could seek performance in place of the association. The defendant’s response was treated as a denial of the claim and the dispute was examined on its merits. The claim was allowed in part: principal, substantiated accrued late-payment interest and further late-payment interest of 0.07% per day on unpaid principal from 26 February 2015 until payment were awarded. Earlier late-payment interest was refused because the claim lacked a clear and unambiguous calculation. Costs were apportioned: 62% to the defendant and 38% to the company. The company was awarded 186 euros in state fees. An award does not establish actual payment.

Outcome of this decision

The new creditor was awarded principal and some late-payment interest; earlier late-payment interest was refused for inadequate calculation.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
1. Allow the claim in part.