Skip to decisions
Žuk — ANTON и JELENA

Narva apartment associations Court decisions

The collection is growing. We explain decisions in accessible language. Browsing by subject helps readers study building management practice, explore similar situations and prevent conflicts.

Materials for studying practice. An editorial summary does not replace an individual legal assessment or promise a dispute outcome.

Subjects and subtopics

A subject describes the dispute; it does not establish a violation.

Additional parameters

Reset all
Case 2-23-110738Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Hariduse tn 26 korteriühistu · 80218606

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The settlement distinguishes ordinary interest from consequences of breaching instalments.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-23-110738/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Instalments and different interest conditions

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Hariduse tn 26 korteriühistu · 80218606

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Hariduse tn 26 korteriühistu; debtor XX — party to the settlement

How it started · editorial summary

The settlement distinguishes ordinary interest from consequences of breaching instalments.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved an instalment settlement between Narva linn, Hariduse tn 26 korteriühistu and XX for acknowledged management charges and other payments and terminated proceedings. The settlement includes reimbursement of 32.50 euros of the association’s state fee, equal monthly instalments and a separate final payment. The order gives no detailed objections to the charges. Interest of 0.02% per day on unpaid management charges and other payments applies from 1 November 2023. Breach of the schedule makes the whole obligation immediately payable, with interest of 0.02% per day on the entire obligation from 1 April 2023. These are different conditions; the court did not establish a breach. Other costs remain with each participant. A state-budget refund of 32.50 euros in payment-order fees was refused; this does not cancel the debtor’s agreed reimbursement of that portion. Subsequent performance is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Settlement approved and proceedings terminated. The separate interest conditions remain; the state-fee refund was refused.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case no. 2-23-110738.
First instance
Case 2-22-138703Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Rahu tn 28a korteriühistu · 80158560

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

Two persons acknowledged a common joint and several obligation. The court approved the agreement, but performance of the schedule with already elapsed deadlines is not confirmed.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-22-138703/7Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Rahu tn 28a: court approved two debtors’ agreement with the association

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Rahu tn 28a korteriühistu · 80158560

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Rahu tn 28a korteriühistu; interested person XX — party to the agreement; other interested person XX — party to the agreement; association’s representative XX

How it started · editorial summary

Two persons acknowledged a common joint and several obligation. The court approved the agreement, but performance of the schedule with already elapsed deadlines is not confirmed.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved Narva linn, Rahu tn 28a korteriühistu’s agreement with two interested persons XX and terminated the case. The participants acknowledged a common obligation for building maintenance, other payments and court costs; the act does not set out detailed objections to charges. The two persons are jointly and severally liable: the common unpaid amount may be sought from either, but cannot be recovered in full twice. The schedule provides three equal payments with deadlines before the ruling. The document does not say whether they had been made by approval. Breach makes the obligation immediately enforceable and requires payment of earlier interest specified in the agreement and further interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid maintenance expenses and other payments. The court did not find that these conditions had occurred. Each party bears other costs; the association was awarded a 32,50 euro fee refund. The act states that the parties waived appeals. Approval does not confirm schedule performance or the current balance.

Outcome of this decision

Admit the application, approve the agreement on two persons’ joint and several obligation and three equal payments, and terminate the case. Breach provides for immediate performance, earlier interest and further interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid maintenance expenses and other payments. Leave other costs to participants; refund the association a 32,50 euro fee.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
3. Terminate proceedings in civil case No 2-22-138703.
First instance
Case 2-22-126130Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Viru tn 19 korteriühistu · 80522114

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The instalment settlement provides a conditional interest concession.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-22-126130/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Instalments and conditional suspension of interest

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Viru tn 19 korteriühistu · 80522114

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Viru tn 19 korteriühistu; debtor XX — party to the settlement; applicant’s contractual representative XX

How it started · editorial summary

The instalment settlement provides a conditional interest concession.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved a settlement between Narva linn, Viru tn 19 korteriühistu and XX for instalment payment of acknowledged management-charge debt, interest and costs, and terminated proceedings. Equal monthly instalments and a separate final payment were agreed; current bills remain payable separately on time. The order gives no detailed objections to the calculation. Proper compliance with the schedule suspends interest on the principal from 22 September 2022. Breach removes the concession and interest resumes from that same date. The court did not establish subsequent breach or performance. Agreed costs of 132.50 euros comprise 32.50 euros in state fees and 100 euros in legal costs. Other costs remain with each participant; a separate state-fee refund of 32.50 euros to the association was ordered. Reduction of the appeal period to three days was refused as unavailable in this procedure.

Outcome of this decision

Instalments approved and proceedings terminated; suspension of interest depends on compliance. Appeal period not reduced.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case no. 2-22-126130.
First instance
Case 2-22-134627Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Rahu tn 14 korteriühistu · 80015323

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved monthly instalments for an acknowledged obligation while preserving the possibility of appeal.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-22-134627/3Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Rahu tn 14: debt instalments approved until January 2026

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Rahu tn 14 korteriühistu · 80015323

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant — Narva linn, Rahu tn 14 korteriühistu; debtor XX — party to the agreement; association’s representative XX

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved monthly instalments for an acknowledged obligation while preserving the possibility of appeal.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved Narva linn, Rahu tn 14 korteriühistu’s agreement with XX to pay the acknowledged obligation in instalments and terminated the case. It did not grant the request to exclude appeals. After the agreement was submitted, the case was transferred from payment order proceedings to Viru Maakohus for approval. The acknowledged obligation includes building maintenance, other payments, interest and court costs; the act contains no separate examination of objections to charges. The schedule provides equal monthly payments and a separate last payment. Unpaid maintenance costs and other payments carry interest of 0,02% per day. Breach of the schedule makes the entire agreed obligation immediately payable; the court did not establish that a breach had actually occurred. Each party bears other costs; the request for a partial fee refund is decided separately after entry into force. The court considered waiver of appeal impermissible under the procedure applied. Performance of the schedule and the later balance are not confirmed.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly instalments with a separate final payment and terminate the case. Provide interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid maintenance costs and other payments, with immediate full payment on breach of schedule. Leave other costs to participants and decide the fee refund separately. Refuse to exclude appeals.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case No 2-22-134627.
First instance
Case 2-21-141342Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Soldina tn 10 korteriühistu · 80170667

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

How it started · editorial summary

The association and two debtors agreed on instalments and payment of current invoices. The court approved the settlement and closed the case without establishing actual compliance with the schedule.

· Court orderViru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance · № 2-21-141342/4Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Approval of an instalment agreement for debt owed to an association

Court order · Viru Maakohus Narva kohtumaja · First instance

Narva linn, A-A. Tiimanni tn 10 korteriühistu · 80170667

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, A-A. Tiimanni tn 10 korteriühistu; Debtor I — XX; Debtor II — XX

How it started · editorial summary

The association and two debtors agreed on instalments and payment of current invoices. The court approved the settlement and closed the case without establishing actual compliance with the schedule.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, A-A. Tiimanni tn 10 korteriühistu (now — Narva linn, Soldina tn 10 korteriühistu) sought payment from two individuals identified as XX. After their objections, the case was transferred from payment-order proceedings to Viru Maakohus. The participants submitted an agreement acknowledging a debt comprising principal, late-payment interest and costs, to be paid in instalments over six months. Current invoices from the February 2022 invoice onward remain payable in addition to instalments on the old debt. For delay, the agreement provides daily late-payment interest of 0.022% on the unpaid principal. The act does not provide for acceleration of the entire debt. The court found no conflict with law or good morals, approved the settlement and discontinued proceedings. Costs were dealt with as agreed, with no further reimbursable costs. The court explained the availability of enforcement if the agreement is breached and the bar on a new action between the same parties about the same subject. Approval of the schedule does not establish that payment has been made.

Outcome of this decision

The instalment settlement was approved and proceedings discontinued. Current invoices remain separately payable and agreed late-payment interest applies to delay. This act does not establish actual compliance with the schedule.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
There are no reimbursable procedural costs not specified in the settlement.
First instance
Case 2-22-115560Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 63a korteriühistu · 80054501

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved a schedule already under way: the association reported four timely payments, but the ruling does not confirm full performance.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-22-115560/7Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Tallinna mnt 63a: court approved an agreement’s payment schedule already under way

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 63a korteriühistu · 80054501

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant – Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 63a korteriühistu; debtor XX – party to the agreement; association representative XX

How it started · editorial summary

The court approved a schedule already under way: the association reported four timely payments, but the ruling does not confirm full performance.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The apartment association Narva linn, Tallinna mnt 63a and XX entered an instalment agreement for arrears. The court approved it after the association reported initial voluntary payments and terminated the case. The payment proposal in payment order proceedings could not be served, but the parties submitted a signed agreement. The association reported that the first four payments were made on time: performance had begun before court approval. The acknowledged obligation includes building maintenance, other payments and litigation costs. It provides equal monthly instalments and a separate final payment, plus interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid management expenses and other payments. Breach of the schedule makes the entire agreed obligation immediately payable. The court considered the agreement permissible and enforceable. Each bears its other costs; a 32,50-euro court fee refund from the state budget was ordered for the association. A request to exclude appeals was rejected as impermissible in the procedure used. Full performance of the schedule and the current balance were not established.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly instalments with a separate final payment. The agreement provides for interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid management expenses and other payments and immediate payment of the full obligation on breach. Terminate the case and leave other costs with the participants; refund the association 32,50 euros in court fees. Refuse exclusion of appeals.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case No. 2-22-115560.
First instance
Case 2-22-9817Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Linda tn 1 korteriühistu · 80180424

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

How it started · editorial summary

The agreement provides for instalments, separate payment of current bills and a waiver of further late-payment interest.

· Court orderViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-22-9817/8Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Linda tn 1: payment of arrears and current bills

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Linda tn 1 korteriühistu · 80180424

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — Narva linn, Linda tn 1 korteriühistu; Person concerned — XX

How it started · editorial summary

The agreement provides for instalments, separate payment of current bills and a waiver of further late-payment interest.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Narva linn, Linda tn 1 korteriühistu sought management-cost arrears. The court approved its agreement with XX to pay the acknowledged debt and agreed costs by instalments and ended the proceedings. The association waived further late-payment interest. The order does not describe detailed objections to the charges. Monthly payments and a separate final payment were agreed. Current association bills must be paid in addition. A missed instalment allows the whole debt to be enforced. Once the agreement is performed, no mutual claims remain in this case. Agreed costs total 298 euros: 25 euros in state fees, 270 euros in legal costs and 3 euros for obtaining a document. Each participant bears other costs. The association was awarded a refund of 25 euros in state fees from the budget. The agreed appeal period is two days from service. Neither performance nor the refund is established.

Outcome of this decision

Approve payment of the acknowledged debt and agreed costs by instalments and end the proceedings. Current bills are paid separately; delay permits enforcement of the whole debt. The association waives further late-payment interest. Each participant bears other costs; refund 25 euros in state fees to the association.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. End the proceedings in civil case no. 2-22-9817 following the conclusion of a settlement agreement.
First instance
Case 2-21-138248Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Vaksali tn 13 korteriühistu · 80480787

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

After objections to the payment order, the association and debtor settled the dispute by agreement.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-21-138248/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Vaksali tn 13: court approved instalments agreed by association and debtor

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Vaksali tn 13 korteriühistu · 80480787

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant – apartment association; Debtor – XX

How it started · editorial summary

After objections to the payment order, the association and debtor settled the dispute by agreement.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Viru Maakohus approved the settlement between Narva linn, Vaksali tn 13 korteriühistu and debtor XX and terminated proceedings. The parties agreed payment of building maintenance arrears, a 30,03-euro court fee and 89,70 euros for legal assistance. These are agreed terms, rather than an independent judicial determination of every basis for the debt. The debtor undertook to repay the debt in monthly instalments. The agreement also provides for late-payment interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid building maintenance arrears from the agreed date. Breach of the schedule makes the entire remaining obligation immediately enforceable. The case began with an application for a payment order. After the debtor objected, papers were referred to Viru Maakohus, where the participants submitted the agreement. Each bears its other litigation costs. The court ordered a 30,03-euro court fee refund to the association from the state budget. The ruling contains the parties’ agreed waiver of appeal; actual performance of the agreement is not confirmed.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly instalments for the debt, 30,03 euros in court fees and 89,70 euros for legal assistance. Late-payment interest of 0,02% per day is provided on unpaid building maintenance arrears from the agreed date; breach makes the full remaining obligation immediately enforceable. Terminate proceedings. Each party bears its other costs. Refund the association 30,03 euros in court fees.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
3. The parties shall bear their own litigation costs not specified in the settlement.
First instance
Case 2-21-138254Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Kreenholmi tn 12 korteriühistu · 80508340

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The association and debtor submitted an instalment agreement before a payment order was issued.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-21-138254/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Kreenholmi tn 12: instalments approved, but court did not accept appeal waiver

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Kreenholmi tn 12 korteriühistu · 80508340

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant – apartment association; Debtor – XX

How it started · editorial summary

The association and debtor submitted an instalment agreement before a payment order was issued.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Viru Maakohus approved the settlement between Narva linn, Kreenholmi tn 12 korteriühistu and debtor XX and terminated proceedings. The agreement provides for payment of building maintenance and other arrears, a 22,50-euro court fee and 89,70 euros for legal assistance. The parties agreed monthly instalments. The ruling contains no confirmation of performance. The association may demand late-payment interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid expenses and other payments from the agreed date. Breach of the schedule makes the entire remaining obligation immediately enforceable. Each participant bears expenses not named in the agreement. The court left the fee refund for a separate ruling after finality. It rejected the parties’ request to exclude appeals, finding such an agreement impermissible in the procedure used. Approval of the settlement therefore did not mean waiver of the right to appeal the ruling.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly instalments for the debt, 22,50 euros in court fees and 89,70 euros for legal assistance, with late-payment interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid expenses and other payments from the agreed date. Breach makes the full remaining obligation immediately enforceable. Terminate proceedings. Refuse the request to exclude appeals. Decide the fee refund separately.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case No. 2-21-138254.
First instance
Case 2-21-4363Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Soldina tn 2 korteriühistu · 80180921

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The association and debtor submitted an agreement acknowledging debt and providing a payment schedule.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-21-4363/4Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

A-A. Tiimanni tn 2: two-year instalments for debt and costs approved

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, A-A. Tiimanni tn 2 korteriühistu · 80180921

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: Applicant — apartment association; Debtor — XX

How it started · editorial summary

The association and debtor submitted an agreement acknowledging debt and providing a payment schedule.

The dispute and the court’s decision

Viru Maakohus approved a settlement between Narva linn, A-A. Tiimanni tn 2 korteriühistu and debtor XX and terminated proceedings. The debtor acknowledged debt for building maintenance and other payments, plus a 25 euro fee, 300 euros in legal assistance and 3 euros for collecting evidence. The parties agreed monthly payments over two years. The association may seek late-payment interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid debt from the agreed date. This term is separate from the consequence of breach of schedule: if the agreement is breached, the association may demand immediate payment of all remaining debt. The court found the agreement admissible. Each participant bears other court costs. The association was awarded a 25 euro fee refund from the budget. The parties waived appeals against the ruling. The act explains recourse to a bailiff on non-performance. It does not confirm actual payments or refund of the fee.

Outcome of this decision

Approve two-year monthly instalments for debt and costs: a 25 euro fee, 300 euros in legal assistance and 3 euros for evidence collection. Provide late-payment interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid debt from the agreed date and a right to demand immediate payment of the balance on breach of schedule. Terminate proceedings; leave other costs to participants. Refund the association a 25 euro fee.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
4. The parties shall bear their own procedural costs not specified in the settlement.
First instance
Case 2-21-4758Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Soldina tn 2 korteriühistu · 80180921

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedules

How it started · editorial summary

The association and debtor XX agreed on acknowledgment of debt, inclusion of costs and monthly instalments. The court approved the terms and terminated the case.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-21-4758/4Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

A-A. Tiimanni tn 2: court approved instalments for 914,22 euros in debt and costs

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, A-A. Tiimanni tn 2 korteriühistu · 80180921

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant – Narva linn, A-A. Tiimanni tn 2 korteriühistu; interested person XX – debtor and party to the agreement; association representative XX

How it started · editorial summary

The association and debtor XX agreed on acknowledgment of debt, inclusion of costs and monthly instalments. The court approved the terms and terminated the case.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved the instalment agreement between the apartment association Narva linn, A-A. Tiimanni tn 2 and debtor XX and terminated the case. The association initially sought principal and continuing late-payment interest; before determination, the participants agreed a smaller debt and payment schedule. The ruling does not set out separate debtor objections to the initial charges. Under the agreement, XX acknowledged unpaid management expenses and other payments. The agreed obligation also includes 25 euros, half the court fee, 300 euros for legal assistance and 3 euros to obtain evidence. The debtor acknowledged that payment was due, and the association gave additional time for voluntary performance. The schedule provides for monthly payments. The agreement entitles the association to demand late-payment interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid management expenses and other payments from the agreed date. Breach makes the entire agreed obligation immediately payable. The court examined the documents, checked the agreement’s permissibility and enforceability, approved it on 9 July 2021 and terminated proceedings. Each participant bears expenses not included in the agreement. The court ordered the association refunded 25 euros, half the court fee, from the state budget. The participants waived appeal against the ruling; it does not confirm subsequent payment under the schedule.

Outcome of this decision

Approve monthly instalments for the debt and costs: 25 euros, half the court fee, 300 euros for legal assistance and 3 euros to obtain evidence. Provide for late-payment interest of 0,02% per day on unpaid management expenses and other payments from the agreed date and immediate full payment on breach. Terminate proceedings, leave other costs with the participants and refund the association 25 euros in court fees.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
II. Terminate proceedings in civil case 2-21-4758 following approval of the settlement.
First instance
Case 2-21-107646Source: Riigi Teataja ↗

Narva linn, Võidu prospekt 13 korteriühistu · 80189477

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsLate-payment interest and consequences of delayInstalments and payment schedulesPayment accounting and set-off

How it started · editorial summary

After payment order recovery began, the association and debtor XX agreed the balance and six monthly payments. The association confirmed an earlier partial payment.

· RulingViru Maakohus · First instance · № 2-21-107646/5Read actFirst instance

Separate act page

Võidu prospekt 13: instalments approved for 619,62-euro balance after partial payment

Ruling · Viru Maakohus · First instance

Narva linn, Võidu prospekt 13 korteriühistu · 80189477

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: applicant – Narva linn, Võidu prospekt 13 korteriühistu; interested person XX – debtor and party to the agreement; association’s legal and contractual representatives XX

How it started · editorial summary

After payment order recovery began, the association and debtor XX agreed the balance and six monthly payments. The association confirmed an earlier partial payment.

The dispute and the court’s decision

The court approved the agreement between the apartment association Narva linn, Võidu prospekt 13 and debtor XX for scheduled repayment of the remaining debt and terminated the case. The association initially sought recovery through expedited payment order proceedings. Pärnu Maakohus then ended that procedure and referred the case to Viru Maakohus to approve the agreement. The debtor acknowledged principal, accrued late-payment interest and 65 euros in costs. The association confirmed an earlier partial payment and agreed the balance with the debtor. The ruling does not establish subsequent compliance with the schedule. The balance is payable in six monthly instalments. Current association bills must also continue to be paid. Delay entails late-payment interest of 0,022% per day on the unpaid amount. The court examined the agreement, found it permissible and enforceable, approved its terms on 21 May 2021 and terminated proceedings. The 65 euros in costs included in the agreement form part of the admitted obligation; each participant bears its other costs with no separate mutual reimbursement. The ruling does not set out independent objections to the original charges.

Outcome of this decision

Approve the agreement taking account of the partial payment confirmed by the association. The outstanding debt, late-payment interest and agreed 65 euros in costs are payable in six monthly instalments. Retain current bills and late-payment interest of 0,022% per day on unpaid amounts upon delay. Terminate proceedings; leave other costs with the participants.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
2. Terminate proceedings in civil case No. 2-21-107646.
First instance