Skip to decisions
Žuk — ANTON и JELENA
Back to decisions

Instalments and two separate fee reimbursements

Viru Maakohus · First instance

Apartment association bills, payments and debtsDebt claimsInstalments and payment schedulesLate-payment interest and consequences of delay

Instalments and two separate fee reimbursements

Court order · Viru Maakohus · First instance

KÜ Kreenholmi 30 · 80145994

Entry into force has not been reverified

Participants and roles: claimant and settlement creditor — KÜ Kreenholmi 30; defendant XX — accepted the payment schedule

How it started · editorial summary

The settlement distinguishes reimbursement of costs from a state-budget fee refund.

The dispute and the court’s decision

KÜ Kreenholmi 30 (now — Narva linn, Kreenholmi tn 30 korteriühistu). The court approved a settlement between KÜ Kreenholmi 30 and XX for monthly payment over nine months of debt, late-payment interest and agreed costs, and terminated proceedings. The settlement includes 108 euros in legal costs and 125 euros representing half the state fee. Late payment of an instalment permits enforcement; that condition adds no further late-payment interest rate. The general costs clause places half the fee, 125 euros, on XX and leaves other costs with the parties. Separately, a state-budget refund is ordered to the association in the amount of 125 euros from its 250-euro fee. Reimbursement by the defendant and the budget refund are distinct obligations. The appeal period was reduced to three days after service. Performance is not established.

Outcome of this decision

Settlement approved and proceedings terminated; an overdue instalment permits enforcement.
Translation of an anonymised, abridged excerpt from Estonian
II. Terminate proceedings in civil case no. 2-14-59481.